Total Pageviews

Monday, December 27, 2010

The 5 Secrets Of Self - Made Millionaires

They’re just like you. But with lots of money.

When you think “millionaire,” what image comes to mind? For many of us, it’s a flashy Wall Street banker type who flies a private jet, collects cars and lives the kind of decadent lifestyle that would make Donald Trump proud.

But many modern millionaires live in middle-class neighborhoods, work full-time and shop in discount stores like the rest of us. What motivates them isn’t material possessions but the choices that money can bring: “For the rich, it’s not about getting more stuff. It’s about having the freedom to make almost any decision you want,” says T. Harv Eker, author of Secrets of the Millionaire Mind. Wealth means you can send your child to any school or quit a job you don’t like.

According to the Spectrem Wealth Study, an annual survey of America’s wealthy, there are more people living the good life than ever before—the number of millionaires nearly doubled in the last decade. And the rich are getting richer. To make it onto the Forbes 400 list of the richest Americans, a mere billionaire no longer makes the cut. This year you needed a net worth of at least $1.3 billion.

If more people are getting richer than ever, why shouldn’t you be one of them? Here, five people who have at least a million dollars in liquid assets share the secrets that helped them get there.

1. Set your sights on where you’re going

Twenty years ago, Jeff Harris hardly seemed on the road to wealth. He was a college dropout who struggled to support his wife, DeAnn, and three kids, working as a grocery store clerk and at a junkyard where he melted scrap metal alongside convicts. “At times we were so broke that we washed our clothes in the bathtub because we couldn’t afford the Laundromat.” Now he’s a 49-year-old investment advisor and multimillionaire in York, South Carolina.
There was one big reason Jeff pulled ahead of the pack: He always knew he’d be rich. The reality is that 80 percent of Americans worth at least $5 million grew up in middle-class or lesser households, just like Jeff.
Wanting to be wealthy is a crucial first step. Says Eker, “The biggest obstacle to wealth is fear. People are afraid to think big, but if you think small, you’ll only achieve small things.”
It all started for Jeff when he met a stockbroker at a Christmas party. “Talking to him, it felt like discovering fire,” he says. “I started reading books about investing during my breaks at the grocery store, and I began putting $25 a month in a mutual fund.” Next he taught a class at a local community college on investing. His students became his first clients, which led to his investment practice. “There were lots of struggles,” says Jeff, “but what got me through it was believing with all my heart that I would succeed.”

2. Educate yourself

When Steve Maxwell graduated from college, he had an engineering degree and a high-tech job—but he couldn’t balance his checkbook. “I took one finance class in college but dropped it to go on a ski trip,” says the 45-year-old father of three, who lives in Windsor, Colorado. “I actually had to go to my bank and ask them to teach me how to read my statement.”
One of the biggest obstacles to making money is not understanding it: Thousands of us avoid investing because we just don’t get it. But to make money, you must be financially literate. “It bothered me that I didn’t understand this stuff,” says Steve, “so I read books and magazines about money management and investing, and I asked every financial whiz I knew to explain things to me.”
He and his wife started applying the lessons: They made a point to live below their means. They never bought on impulse, always negotiated better deals (on their cars, cable bills, furniture) and stayed in their home long after they could afford a more expensive one. They also put 20 percent of their annual salary into investments.
Within ten years, they were millionaires, and people were coming to Steve for advice. “Someone would say, ‘I need to refinance my house—what should I do?’ A lot of times, I wouldn’t know the answer, but I’d go find it and learn something in the process,” he says.
In 2003, Steve quit his job to become part owner of a company that holds personal finance seminars for employees of corporations like Wal-Mart. He also started going to real estate investment seminars, and it’s paid off: He now owns $30 million worth of investment properties, including apartment complexes, a shopping mall and a quarry.
“I was an engineer who never thought this life was possible, but all it truly takes is a little self-education,” says Steve. “You can do anything once you understand the basics.”

3. Passion pays off

In 1995, Jill Blashack Strahan and her husband were barely making ends meet. Like so many of us, Jill was eager to discover her purpose, so she splurged on a session with a life coach. “When I told her my goal was to make $30,000 a year, she said I was setting the bar too low. I needed to focus on my passion, not on the paycheck.”
Jill, who lives with her son in Alexandria, Minnesota, owned a gift basket company and earned just $15,000 a year. She noticed when she let potential buyers taste the food items, the baskets sold like crazy. Jill thought, Why not sell the food directly to customers in a fun setting?
With $6,000 in savings, a bank loan and a friend’s investment, Jill started packaging gourmet foods in a backyard shed and selling them at taste-testing parties. It wasn’t easy. “I remember sitting outside one day, thinking we were three months behind on our house payment, I had two employees I couldn’t pay, and I ought to get a real job. But then I thought, no, this is your dream. Recommit and get to work.
She stuck with it, even after her husband died three years later. “I live by the law of abundance, meaning that even when there are challenges in life, I look for the win- win” she says.
The positive attitude worked: Jill’s backyard company, Tastefully Simple, is now a direct-sales business, with $120 million in sales last year. And Jill was named one of the top 25 female business owners in North America by Fast Company magazine.
According to research by Thomas J. Stanley, author of The Millionaire Mind, over 80 percent of millionaires say they never would have been successful if their vocation wasn’t something they cared about.

4. Grow your money

Most of us know the never-ending cycle of living paycheck to paycheck. “The fastest way to get out of that pattern is to make extra money for the specific purpose of reinvesting in yourself,” says Loral Langemeier, author of The Millionaire Maker. In other words, earmark some money for the sole purpose of investing it in a place where it will grow dramatically—like a business or real estate.
There are endless ways to make extra money for investing—you just have to be willing to do the work. “Everyone has a marketable skill,” says Langemeier. “When I started out, I had a tutoring business, seeing clients in the morning before work and on my lunch break.”
A little moonlighting cash really can grow into a million. Twenty-five years ago, Rick Sikorski dreamed of owning a personal training business. “I rented a tiny studio where I charged $15 an hour,” he says. When money started trickling in, he squirreled it away instead of spending it, putting it all back into the business. Rick’s 400-square-foot studio is now Fitness Together, a franchise based in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, with more than 360 locations worldwide. And he’s worth over $40 million.
When extra money rolls in, it’s easy to think, Now I can buy that new TV. But if you want to get rich, you need to pay yourself first, by putting money where it will work hard for you—whether that’s in your retirement fund, a side business or investments like real estate.

5. No guts, no glory

Last summer, Dave Lindahl footed the bill for 18 relatives at a fancy mansion in the Adirondacks. One night, his dad looked out at the scenery and joked, “I can’t believe we used to call you the black sheep!”
At 29, Dave was broke, living in a small apartment near Boston and wondering what to do after ten years in a local rock band. “I looked around and thought, If I don’t do something, I’ll be stuck here forever.”
He started a landscape company, buying his equipment on credit. When business literally froze over that winter, a banker friend asked if he’d like to renovate a foreclosed home. “I’m a terrible carpenter, but I needed the money, so I went to some free seminars at Home Depot and figured it out as I went,” he says.
After a few more renovations, it occurred to him: Why not buy the homes and sell them for profit? He took a risk and bought his first property. Using the proceeds, he bought another, and another. Twelve years later, he owns apartment buildings, worth $143 million, in eight states.

The Biggest Secret? Stop spending.
Every millionaire we spoke to has one thing in common: Not a single one spends needlessly. Real estate investor Dave Lindahl drives a Ford Explorer and says his middle-class neighbors would be shocked to learn how much he’s worth. Fitness mogul Rick Sikorski can’t fathom why anyone would buy bottled water. Steve Maxwell, the finance teacher, looked at a $1.5 million home but decided to buy one for half the price because “a house with double the cost wouldn’t give me double the enjoyment.”

source : Reader's Digest,SHINE

With love and passion,
Amreish Siman

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

The Power

To celebrate the end of the year, and to guarantee that 2011 is your absolute best year yet, this Secret Scrolls contains one of the life-changing revelations from the book The Power, and one of the most powerful processes you can do in your life.


Whether you realize it or not, you bring everything to you through the power of your imagination. The power of imagination is not something you have to acquire; you have it already! You think in images even if you aren't aware that you do, and you use imagination or imaging every single day of your life. When you think about the past you are imagining. When you think about the future you are imagining. And as you imagine and concentrate on anything with feeling, you are bringing it to you.

When you worry about something, you are using your immense power of imagination negatively. You are imagining the worst, and as you imagine the worst, you are bringing it to you. When you are excited about something, you are using your power of imagination positively. You are imagining the best, and as you imagine the best, you are bringing it to you.

Using the power of your imagination is something that comes to you naturally, but I want you to understand something about your imagination that will change your life: Whatever you can imagine already exists! You simply can't imagine anything unless it exists already, because when you imagine something you are actually tuning into a particular frequency, and if that frequency didn't exist in the Universe you wouldn't be able to tune into it. So when you imagine yourself with something you want you are tuning into a real thing that already exists, and you are looking at the very frequency of you with your desire!

Now I am going to take you step by step through a revolutionary process using your imagination from the book The Power.

First, imagine something that you really want. It could be money, health, a particular job, a partner, a vacation, happiness, or anything else. Imagine yourself with your desire; close your eyes and really get the picture of yourself with your desire.

Pay special attention to what you see about yourself in your imagined picture. Notice how you are talking. Notice how you are moving. Notice how you are walking. Notice how you are acting. Notice how you are feeling. Look at everything about yourself in your imagined picture, but in particular, notice how happy you are! Capture every detail that you can, and open your eyes.


Understand that the picture you just imagined of yourself with your desire exists already! You know it exists because if it didn't exist how could you tune into it? How could you see it in your imagination? When you imagined yourself, you were looking at the actual real version of you with your desire!

Can you see the difference between yourself right now and your imagined picture of yourself? Because your job is to become as much like the version of yourself in the picture as you can! Walk like that now. Talk like that now. Act like that now. Feel the same as that, now. Become as happy as that person, now. Be that person, now! When you become the person in your imagined picture you have shifted yourself to the frequency of your desire, and it must and will appear. Your imagination is showing you precisely the person you need to become. It is showing you what you look like and how to act and feel so that you can copy it and become that person!

To help you become more and more like the person in your imagination, practice closing your eyes and seeing yourself in the imagined picture with your desire as many times as you want. Seeing the imagined picture of yourself will continuously remind you how you need to be, feel, and act. Then come out of your imagination and go about your day doing your best to act and feel like that person, now. You will be amazed at how little copying it takes before you see the evidence that your desire is coming.

This is one of the most powerful processes you can ever do to make your desires appear with lightning speed. This process is based on the physics of the Universe. Use it! Practice it! You have The Power to your life; every force in the Universe will do anything for you, but you have to use The Power that you have!



Merry Christmas & Happy New Year, and may joy be with you in every moment.

Source : Rhonda Byrne from The Secret and The Power..

 
With love and passion,
Amreish Siman

Thursday, September 2, 2010

The 3 Great Truths of the Mahabharata

In one of Swami's early visits to Venkatagiri in Andhra Pradesh, Swami Sathya Sai Baba gave a wonderful Discourse on the great Truths of the Mahabarata, The Divine Discourse is wonderful, following are some excerpts :

" If the Puranas are described as constituting an Upanga of the Vedas, the itihasas(the epics) are so highly thought of as to be placed on an equal footing with the Vedas. The Mahabharata is indeed called the fifth Veda ("pancamo Vedah").

The Mahabarata teaching everyone three great truths that are

1 ) Devotion

Bhakti of Arjuna to Lord Krishna, Arjuna never ever even once went against anything that Sri Krishna ever told him or commanded him, his was the great form of Devotion, many many times During the Mahabarata war on the battlefield, when the war was in full swing, Krishna would suddenly take his chariot away and go far away, Arjuna never questioned Krishna even once,that is why Krishna told all the great truths in the form of Bhagawad Gita to Arjuna only.

In the history of the world, the greatest Form of Devotion is seen in Arjuna, Krishna was everything for Arjuna, that is why Arjuna lost all his warrior skills when Krishna went back to Vaikunta. Krishna gave Sudama Riches, gave Yashoda his Love, showed many many people his greatness, but gave himself to Arjuna, That is why Swami says when you have great devotion and love for the Lord, He Gives himself to you, He becomes you. You become Him.


2) Dharma

The Second Great Truth of the Mahabarata is Dharma.

Dharmaraja, Yudhistira,Dharmateja was the centre of everything that was Dharma in this world, He never ever Wavered from the path of Dharma, the Pandavas suffered humiliations like no others in their lives, but Dharmaraja never wavered from the path of Righteousness, His is the greatest example of what a righteous man should be, he is the great example of Truth and truthfulness, everyone should follow his ideals.





3) Sacrifice

The Third Most Wonderful Truth of the Mahabarata is Sacrifice -

Thousands of kings and princes, hearing of Drona's skill, came to Hastinapur with the purpose of learning from him. Among them was Ekalavya, son of Hiranyadhanus, king of the Nishadas.Drona, prudent in dharma, refused to accept a Nishada as his pupil. But Ekalavya bent his head at Drona's feet and went to a forest where he made a clay statue of Drona.Worshipping the statue as his acharya, Ekalavya started practicing the use of weapons before it without fail, every day.

Dronacharya's main ambition was to make Arjuna the greatest archer of all times, he gave special training to Arjuna, showed great interest in him, one day during an expedition in the forest, the leading dog in the hunting pack was missing, they found it with its mouth open and seven arrows in it, everyone was dumb struck, who was the great archer who did this, Dhrona himself had never seen anything like this before.

Suddenly a Nishada appreared and Dhrona knew that he was not an ordinary man but someone driven with a strong will to suceed, The Young Boy led him to a statue in the clearing in the Forest and everyone was shocked to see Dhronacharya's Statue there, Dhronacharya understood everything , He also understood that while this boy was alive, Arjuna could never become the greatest archer, so as a Guru Dakshina he asked for the Thumb of the Right hand of Ekalavya, It was given to him without Ekalavya even Blinking his eyes.


Do any of you hear Ekalavya's name again in the Mahabarata ?, But his greatest Sacrifice is known even today, Ekalavya knew that Dronacharya was asking him the Dakshina because he never wanted him to shoot an arrow,all his years of Lonely practise would be nothing, But He sacrificed everything for His Master. He sacrificed whatever he had to Dhronacharya. This is Supreme sacrifice, Everyone's sacrificing something in the Mahabarata had some selfish Motive, Ekalavya's was totally unselfish that is why we remember him till this very day.


With love and passion,
Amreish Siman

Monday, August 23, 2010

The Nature Thought Of Energy


Your thoughts are the currencies with which you exchange energy with the universe. Do you believe that your thoughts have energy?
Do you believe that a place or an object can retain the energy of the people that have come into contact with it?

If you have ever entered an old home and sensed the presence of its previous occupants, or held an antique item in your hands and felt the history of it, then you know the answers.


Scientists are just beginning to accept the truth about thought energy, and have begun to study what many have known for centuries. In fact some of today’s leading scientists in areas of physics, biology, psychology and many other fields are starting to recognize the importance of thought energy.

Positive thought energy in the form of collective meditation has been scientifically proven to reduce violent crime!

In 1993 a study encouraged by one the world’s leading physicists was undertaken in Washington D.C to determine if focused meditation could have an effect on that city’s crime rate. The results were astonishing. During the weeks that several volunteers meditated, crime rates fell dramatically by 25 percent! This was no accident. This was scientifically validated and proven to be an effective means of countering the criminal inclinations of a very large group of people…an entire city in fact.

All life is energy.

Thoughts have energy.

Negative thoughts create negative events.

Positive thoughts create positive results.
The energy of thought is either stored in physical structures or is transmitted into the universe, it never dies
.
Consider what this means.
Think about the ramifications.
Where did the clothes you are wearing come from, who made them?
Were they manufactured by depressed and impoverished people working in appalling conditions for weeks to make the same amount of money that you spend on a cup of coffee in the morning?
Who built the car that you drive?
Was it built by disgruntled and tired factory workers? Where some of those workers alcoholics? Did some of them leave work, go home, beat their wives and children and build your car the next morning?
Who built the house that you live in?
Who came into contact with the food that you ate today?

Starting to get the picture?
Everything we come into contact with can hold the thought energy of other people.
Even the air that we breathe carries the thought energy of those it surrounds !

What were the thoughts that have been injected into every part of your life?
How much has the thought energy of others affected you?

Every thought interacts with the energy of the universe.
Negative thought looks for other negatives thought energies to bind with.
Eventually a matrix of negative thought energy is created and forms a thought wave.
These powerful negative thought waves manifest themselves in our lives in the form of poverty, crime, war, plagues and natural disasters.
Negative energy creates a vacuum, it detracts from the life giving nature of the universe.
Negative thought waves come in many sizes and have been known by many names, bad luck, misfortune, disaster, evil, curses, etc.

Call them what you will, the source of their energy is the same. The source is us !

Positive thought energy also seeks out other positive energies.
If you are a source of positive thought energy, positive and beneficial energy will return to you in many wonderful and unexpected ways.
Positive thought energy creates a surplus; it is the surplus of positive thought energy that allows for the creation of life.

You are the source and creator of all things !
Everything that happens in your life has a direct connection with the type of energy that you are charging the universe with.

Remember this !!You alone are responsible for the type of energy created by your life !!

Becoming aware of the power of your own thoughts is the most important step in understanding how to handle the adverse influence of the negative thought of others.
Knowing the value of positive thought energy allows us to become sensitive to negative energy.
We begin to notice it in our own speech, we see it in our relationships, and we notice it in others.

Being aware is the key !
Once we are aware of the negative thought energy in our lives we can take measures to eliminate it and replace it with beneficial, healing energy.
It is as simple as noticing it and dismissing it with our minds.
A thought enters our mind that we recognize as negative, we simply dismiss it.
By dismissing negativity we take away its power by not allowing it to manifest further negativity in our lives.


There are of course many other techniques available to combat negative thought energy and create positive abundance in our lives; including focused meditation among others.
The critical first step however is simply being aware of the existence and effects of these energies.
Hopefully this brief article has helped you to allow that first step to be taken.

Have a blessed day people and be careful of what u think every moment !!

With warm regards,
Amreish Siman

source : Jeffry R. Palmer Ph.D. – Metaphysician, Thought Energy Consultant and Syndicated Columnist, Is the author of "Judo for the Soul - The Art of Psychic Self Defense", as well as several articles and papers relating to metaphysics, spirituality and paranormal phenomena. Further information about Mr. Palmer, his books and articles can be found at: http://the-psychic-detective.com

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Why Should You Be Aware Of Quantum Physics ?


Nobel Prize winning physicists have proven beyond doubt that the physical world is one large sea of energy that flashes into and out of being in milliseconds, over and over again.

Nothing is solid.

This is the world of Quantum Physics.

They have proven that thoughts are what put together and hold together this ever-changing energy field into the ‘objects’ that we see.

So why do we see a person instead of a flashing cluster of energy?

Think of a movie reel.

A movie is a collection of about 24 frames a second. Each frame is separated by a gap. However, because of the speed at which one frame replaces another, our eyes get cheated into thinking that we see a continuous and moving picture.

Think of television.

A TV tube is simply a tube with heaps of electrons hitting the screen in a certain way, creating the illusion of form and motion.

This is what all objects are anyway. You have 5 physical senses (sight, sound, touch, smell, and taste).

Each of these senses has a specific spectrum (for example, a dog hears a different range of sound than you do; a snake sees a different spectrum of light than you do; and so on).

In other words, your set of senses perceives the sea of energy from a certain limited standpoint and makes up an image from that.

It is not complete, nor is it accurate. It is just an interpretation.

All of our interpretations are solely based on the ‘internal map’ of reality that we have, and not the real truth. Our ‘map’ is a result of our personal life’s collective experiences.

Our thoughts are linked to this invisible energy and they determine what the energy forms. Your thoughts literally shift the universe on a particle-by-particle basis to create your physical life.

Look around you.

Everything you see in our physical world started as an idea, an idea that grew as it was shared and expressed, until it grew enough into a physical object through a number of steps.

You literally become what you think about most.

Your life becomes what you have imagined and believed in most.

The world is literally your mirror, enabling you to experience in the physical plane what you hold as your truth … until you change it.

Quantum physics shows us that the world is not the hard and unchangeable thing it may appear to be. Instead, it is a very fluid place continuously built up using our individual and collective thoughts.

What we think is true is really an illusion, almost like a magic trick.

Fortunately we have begun to uncover the illusion and most importantly, how to change it.

What is your body made of?

Nine systems comprise the human body including Circulatory, Digestive, Endocrine, Muscular, Nervous, Reproductive, Respiratory, Skeletal, and Urinary.

What are those made up of?

Tissues and organs.

What are tissues and organs made of?

Cells.

What are cells made of?

Molecules.

What are molecules made of?

Atoms.

What are atoms made of?

Sub-atomic particles.

What are subatomic particles made of?

Energy!

You and I are pure energy-light in its most beautiful and intelligent configuration. Energy that is constantly changing beneath the surface and you control it all with your powerful mind.

You are one big stellar and powerful Human Being.

If you could see yourself under a powerful electron microscope and conduct other experiments on yourself, you would see that you are made up of a cluster of ever-changing energy in the form of electrons, neutrons, photons and so on.

So is everything else around you. Quantum physics tells us that it is the act of observing an object that causes it to be there where and how we observe it.

An object does not exist independently of its observer! So, as you can see, your observation, your attention to something, and your intention, literally creates that thing.

This is scientific and proven.

Your world is made of spirit, mind and body.

Each of those three, spirit, mind and body, has a function that is unique to it and not shared with the other. What you see with your eyes and experience with your body is the physical world, which we shall call Body. Body is an effect, created by a cause.


This cause is Thought.

Body cannot create. It can only experience and be experienced … that is its unique function.

Thought cannot experience … it can only make up, create and interpret. It needs a world of relativity (the physical world, Body) to experience itself.

Spirit is All That Is, that which gives Life to Thought and Body.

Body has no power to create, although it gives the illusion of power to do so. This illusion is the cause of much frustration. Body is purely an effect and has no power to cause or create.

The key with all of this information is how do you learn to see the universe differently than you do now so that you can manifest everything you truly desire.

You are born with the power to manifest the unmanifest.Believe in this and you'll begin to witness miracles happening in your life !!

With love and passion,
Amreish Siman
 
source : http://www.johnassaraf.com

Monday, July 26, 2010

Compositions Of A Film

The basic need to represent a three dimensional reality on a two dimensional surface is certainly not new in the visual arts. What separates film from the other visual arts is that it is kinetic. The filmmaker is composing motion.

Composition of movement in time can be broken down into several dynamics. Movement of the camera is called intraframe movement. Screen sizes and angles of view can be manipulated in this way. Interframe movement is created by editing, cutting from one angle to another or from long shot to close up. The combination of camera movements and editing becomes a truly powerful system for manipulating the film reality. Whether static or moving, the frame represents spatial depth, or three dimensions, on a 2 dimensional screen.
 We’re told by those who have studied the psychology of perception that shadows are one of the clues by which the brain recognizes spatial depth. The fact that the projected image is always seen as a window into a 3 dimensional world is one reason for the filmmaker’s use of these dark and  light areas for ‘designing in depth.’


The figurative painters and engravers of graphic illustrations in the 19th century are worth study by filmmakers. Gustav Dore’s work is an example. He used a formula enormously effective in emphasizing design in depth. In the foreground a subject might be lit strongly, with an emphatic key light and strong modeling. But behind this would be figures more or less in silhouette, in shadow and 2 dimensional. These, in turn, would be outlined against a brighter area in middle distance, a part of light illuminating features of architecture or figures in an area of light. These were again silhouetted, light against dark, against a further background of shadow, gray but still dark. Each recessive plane contrasts with the one beyond it or in front.
The Spanish painter Francisco Goya wrote some 200 years ago. “I see (in nature) only forms that advance, forms that recede, masses in light and shadow.”


Composing in depth isn’t simply a matter of visual richness. It has value in the narrative of the action, the pacing of the scene. Within the same frame, the director can organize the action so that preparation for what will happen next is seen in the background of what is happening now. While our attention is concentrated on what we see nearest to us, we are simultaneously aware of secondary activities that lie beyond, and sometimes even of a third plane of distant activity the dramatic density of the scene is much greater.


Designing the blocking of the actors, the framing of the shot, with this sort of thing in mind and the cinematographer with a grain of sense will instantly realize your intention. He will use light to assist the eye path of the audience and to give dramatic depth to the scene. Composition, both in framing and lighting, directs the viewer’s eye to the appropriate part of the scene.



However,It is the unfortunate for a lot of filmmakers that they are not in charge when their work is being projected. A visit to a local theatre can at times be a heart breaking experience, let alone seeing one’s film on television.In spite of this uncertain future, the film crew puts all its talents and skills into producing a well-composed picture.

source : http://malaysianfilmmakers.blogspot.com/
With love and passion,
Amreish Siman

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Review : Inception

Film : Inception (2010)

Director & Writer : Christopher Nolan
Producer : Emma Thomas,Christopher Nolan
Music : Hans Zimmer
Cast : Leonardo DiCaprio,Ken Watanabe,Joseph Gordon-Levitt,Ellen Page,Tom Hardy,Marion Cotillard,Cilian Murphy,Tom Berenger and Michael Caine
Language : English
Running time : 148 mins,PG-13

'Why did he make this film,people ?'...'Because we gotta watch it'...'He didn't waste the money,did he?'...'Because he's the director Hollywood deserves,the one it bloody needs right now!'...'So,we'll watch his films'..'because he can inspire us'..'because he's not a director'..'he's a master filmaker..a mindful craftsman...THE CREATIVE GENIUS...
 
Most filmakers make films,some directors make movies,but a creative genius will craft a masterpiece,this is one.Christopher Nolan who gave us the best comic-book inspired live action film ever made two years ago and extracted one of the finest performances from an actor who literally gave his life for the role returns with an original concept,an idea so intricately imagined and constructed,it requires maximum utilization of grey matter to just attempt comprehending the entire fiasco and if you thought that could've been said in a simpler,easily understandable way,then don't watch this film because this is not anywhere near Transformers,with explosive ka-boom metal mayhem with kindergarten screenplay,that's Michael Bay's territory,if you're still there,come out please.
 
This film falls under the category of mind**** genre,which means if you've been watching too much Stallone/Arnie/Van Damme/Vijaykanth films,you'll be sitting in the cinema with a Keanu Reeves expression,which is only one...DUH? This film runs along the theme of,most notably The Matrix Trilogy(1999,2003),2001: A Space Odyssey(1968),Minority Report(2001),Virtuosity(1995),The Machinist(2004),Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind(2004),Vanilla Sky(2001) and Shutter Island(2010,also the brilliant DiCaprio,click http://mindsparkenigma.blogspot.com/2010/04/review-shutter-island.html ).If you have watched these films,you'll understand why i believe Inception is a delicious potpourri of all these classics taken one notch higher with Nolan's genius insight.If you have missed some,i say go watch it because it will help fill in the blanks if u leave the theatre dazed and confused.
 
The film centres on the brilliantly inspired idea of 'extraction' of ideas from a person's mind via dreams and is depicted in an corporate espionage setting with a elite team(Joseph Gordon-Levitt,Ellen Page,Tom Hardy),each with a specific skillset,ala A-Team,Ocean's Eleven and films of that kind.The job of the dream team is literally hack into the target's dream and steal their thoughts,specifically highly valuable secrets deeply embedded in their sub-conscious minds to make a living.
Led by Dobb,played by DiCaprio,who like any other leader of smartass misfits in high-tech heist movies,is calling it quits and wants a normal life(did you noticed that almost all heist movies has this plot?,the i'll-do-it-one- last- time for my family/ex-boss loyalty/redemption stuff ),but hey,its Nolan's film,so cheesiness is out of the question !And for the one last mission,the boss,Saito(Ken Watanabe with a funny Jap accent) requires the team to do the opposite,which is to plant the idea/thought instead of extracting it,a process called inception,like planting a seed( pregnancy through in-vitro technique is where the word inception is used widely).The motive here is greed and monopoly,where high-profile corporate tycoon filthy play are abound.The idea is to plant an idea/thought in its rawest and infantile form so that it germinates and develops naturally as if it was an original motivation.The victim is the heir to a dying,super-wealthy tycoon,Bob Fischer(Cilian Murphy,with the same chilly look from Batman Begins) and the raw idea is one that will influence him to turn the tables on the wealth distribution of his father's assets so as to favor Saito to seize total monopoly of the world's energy business.What a plot,eh?
 
Now,this film could've easily been a straight metaphysical- heist film but what makes it stand tall is the complex psychological aspect of it.Leonardo DiCaprio,again,for the third consecutive time finds himself married with a woman with a fractured psyche,there was Revolutionary Road(2008),with a suicidal Kate Winslet(far cry from i jump,you jump melodrama from them in Titanic) and Shutter Island,with a alcoholic child-drowning Michelle Williams( ex-wife of the late Heath Ledger) and here its the beautiful Mal(Marion Cotillard from Public Enemies),a woman 'lost' in her own dream world,an Alice who went too deep into the rabbit-hole she's unable to distinguish illusion from reality,their relationship is portrayed in such a poignantly tragic manner it is heart-wrenching to watch.DiCaprio played his role to such perfection that he's now an expert in playing tragic-deep- loving- husband-of psychologically -troubled-on-screen-wives-with-a-hard-grasp-on-reality-as-a-result-of-intense-guilt-and-regret,nobody else can depict it better than a Scorpio man,and Leo is actually a Scorpio..hahaha..the guy is damn good and so is the rest of the cast actually,only downside is the under-utilization of the legendary Michael Caine,who is a staple face in Nolan's films(The Prestige,Batman films).
 
Technically,the film is a marvel.The cinematography is lush and awe-inducing and the visual-effects are grandiose,there's superb scene(spoiler alert!)where streets fold depicting the sheer creative power of the mind to imagine and manifest almost anything.There's even a revolutionary fight scene in zero-gravity which left me wondering how on Earth did Nolan filmed it !The powerful pulsating score by Hans Zimmer envelops each scene and elevates the impact and feel of the film perfectly,the score is uncharacteristically loud at times,which i notice is Nolan's trend(watch Insomnia,The Prestige,Batman films),his logic to up the volume in particular scenes is Hitchcock-inspired,even Shymalan does it.
 
The best thing about this film is not the above mentioned achievements,the real success here is Nolan's triumphant attempt to creatively depict how the subconscious mind works and the sheer power of thought.The way emotionally-entangled memories embeds itself so deep in our sub-conscious minds that its almost impossible to eradicate is shown brilliantly in scenes where Mal and the kids appear abruptly at the most unexpected circumstances much to the shock and disbelief of Dobb.The sub-conscious mind is a free entity,it cannot be controlled,once an idea/thought/memory is implanted...ahem..sorry...INCEPTED into the sub-conscious,it will germinate and evolve on its own depending on how much power do you feed it,meaning how attached or how deeply you feel or felt about the thought in the first place,if it was an idea or memory which deeply moved,affected or was experienced by you,chances are the frequency of the idea/thought popping out to the conscious mind is very high,just like Dobb.So,be very careful of what you think because you are what you think,you become what you think,such is the power of thoughts.If you thoughts are predominantly negative,then be prepared to face the consequences and expect screw-ups upon screw-ups because you simply asked for it !So,might as well we flood our minds with positive,uplifting and beautiful thoughts because its free !You don't have pay to think,do you?So,think....think big..just like Christopher Nolan did....Inception was his idea...it was a 12 year-old idea,he first presented the story to Warner Bros after he did Memento,originally scripted for a much smaller scale film like his 'Insomnia',but the stupendous success of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight opened gates for him to blow-up the scale to a US$160 million film,allowing him to create this masterpiece the way it deserves to be made.
 
What is the moral of the story here?Christopher Nolan incepted the idea of 'Inception' in his own sub-conscious mind and waited patiently for 12 years until he proved his box-office mettle and for technology to advance and then delivered his baby,a handsome,pricelessly beautiful baby for the world to adore,appreciate and love.Its safe to say he has firmly cemented his place as one of the finest filmakers in the world today,filling in the space left by well...my grandfather,the late Stanley Kubrick :)
Go get enlightened if you haven't !!
 
Rating : A
 
Reviewed by
Amreish Siman

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

The Relationship Between Director & Director Of Photography

Ideally the cinematographer’s relationship with the director is a symbiotic one. The cinematographer embraces the director’s vision and uses his visual talent and technical knowledge to capture the director’s inner thoughts and put them on the screen. Needless to say, the process of choosing a cinematographer is of no small importance to the director.
It is my impression that most of the cameramen have developed a highly personal style. They have an individual character that becomes their stock in trade.

Often a director will screen several films shot by a prospective cinematographer.
In effect, I believe you have to trust the taste and temperament of the cameraman as you see it in his previous work. Obviously, you should take care to see a number of his films to see how he handles different genres; to see what range he has.

BLACK-AND-WHITE AND COLOR

A cinematographer cannot separate the problem of light from the problem of color. Through the film stock he is using, through the filters on lights and lenses, and through the printing in the lab, he cooperates with the art director in the orchestration of colors or in the modulation of the gray scale in the black-and-white films.


I’ve always felt that melodrama and satire have characteristics in common. Ideally, I would prefer to shoot both of these genres in black and white. Distributors nowadays declare that black-and-white movies are unsalable. A compromise may be the kind of cinematography where there is a very emphatic range of tonal values, black to white, at the expense of hue values; strong directional lighting of chiaroscuro, which underlines the architectural structures at the expense of the local colors of the surface.

There are personal idiosyncrasies when it comes to particular colors, for both aesthetic and practical reasons.

With love and passion, Amreish Siman
 
Source : http://malaysianfilmmakers.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

The Creative Intuition

Some individuals seem to have an intuitive sense, as they begin their creative work, about what their final product will be like. Indeed, evidence from several sources confirms the role of intuition in the creative processes of artists and scientists; among these sources are autobiographical testimonies, analyses of historical evidence, psychometric assessments, and experimental studies

In combination, this evidence supports the notion that early intuitions may guide decision making in the process of attaining creative results. But at least three issues remain. First, there may be various forms of intuition.
                                                                             
Second, there may also be various forms of  creativity. Third, it 
might well be the case that only certain forms of intuition are related to certain forms of creativity. It is important to develop a clear conceptual framework for distinguishing various forms of intuition as well as for explaining whether and to what extent they interact with one another and with various forms of creativity.

It is also relevant to distinguish intuition from insight, although the 2 phenomena sometimes overlap. Intuition entails vague and tacit knowledge, whereas insight involves sudden, and usually clear, awareness. In the context of creativity, intuition may precede insight. (See INSIGHT)
Earlier intuition was defined as a tacit form of knowledge that orients decision-making in a promising direction. In the context of innovation, a promising direction is one that leads to potentially creative outcomes. For example, Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, and medicine refer to their own scientific intuition as “a metaphorical seeing of the phenomenon searched for, an anticipatory perception of its shape or its gross structure.”



In time line between an early intuition and its final articulation might very from a brief period to many years, depending on various factors, such as the nature of the problem or the subject’s knowledge base. Jean Piaget, for instance, commenting on the creative process of Charles Darwin, said that he found two results most interesting: the time that Darwin needed to become aware of ideas already implicit in his thought, and the passage from the implicit to the explicit in the creation of new ideas.In fact, Darwin seems to have implicitly prefigured some of his most relevant ideas in his early writings. Highly creative individuals in other domains, such as Pablo Picasso (visual arts),Sigmund Freud (psycho-analysis), Albert Einstein ( modern science),and Stanley Kubrick ( filmaking) appear to have moved along their own creative processes in a similar sequences – starting off with generative  intuitions and ending up with more explicitly articulated products after long periods of persistent work (See FREUD, SIGMUND,KUBRICK,EINSTEIN )

                                                                                                                       

This leads us to a further question. If some individuals have an early intuitive sense about their final product will be like, why does it take them any longer to reach the ultimate goal? In other words, how can we explain a creative process in which the beginning is in a way also the end, given that we have a tacit estimate of the end state right from the start?
Perhaps the creative process unfolds as a developmental sequence of representational changes, from vague, syncretic, and implicit forms of knowledge into more differentiated, integrated, and explicit ones. In more technical terms, it is conceivable, at least, that the creative process might operate as a developmental translation – from an implicit code of associative strengths among neural units into an explicit code of symbolic rules. In this cognitive system, implicit neural networks might precede and
constrain the generation of symbolic rules.
         



INTUITION AS CONSTRAINT

A number of scholars hold that divergent thinking (multidirectional and open ended) is the essential feature of the creative process. But, we may wonder, what prevents divergent thinking from becoming mere rambling as the person considers an infinite sequence of potential alternatives? (See DIVERGENT THINKING)
As we all know, any creative process involves a long series of choices: each decision one makes will affect future options, and one’s alternatives at any given will depend on previous decisions. If individuals had to consider each option that arises in any creative search, the growth of alternatives would become astronomical. In other words, the sequence would lead to what cognitive scientists call a “combinatorial explosion,” and it is very unlikely that the creative process would get to the desired result in any reasonable amount of time.
Creative intuitions may fulfill an important cognitive function: By setting the preliminary boundaries for promising exploration, these initial intuitions may keep the creator’s divergent thinking from generating a combinatorial explosion. That is why creative intuition may be technically defined as a tacit form of knowledge that broadly constrains the creative search by setting its preliminary scope.
Although cognitive scientists have widely acknowledged the need to check a combinatorial explosion in a problem space, they have not considered intuition as a potential constraint for the creative search. Instead, they have focused on heuristics.
Creative intuition may fulfill a similar role to that of heuristics by making the search for possible solutions more selective and efficient. Heuristics, however, are explicit rules of thumb, or particular strategies that, for example, deliberately move away from an old path and look for conflicts and resolve them. Conversely, creative intuitions appear to be implicit rough estimates of the final solution or goal, and advances in this problem space might be measured in terms of how close the subject is to achieving a clear symbolic representation. (See HEURISTICS)
Creative intuition has always been difficult to define, explain, and measure. Conceptualizing it in terms of search in a problem space may be a valid and operational alternative for investigating this phenomenon. But it still leaves many questions unanswered.



With love and passion,
Amreish Siman
 
Source : Encyclopedia of Creativity, Volume 2 By Mark A. Runco, Steven R. Pritzker
Publisher: Academic Press (9 Aug 1999) &
http://malaysianfilmmakers.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Quote Of The Day

QUOTE OF THE DAY

It is not the critic who counts, nor the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows great enthusiasms, great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
      Theodore Roosevelt
       26 th US President
 

 With love and passion,
 Amreish Siman

Startling Discovery ! The Decreasing Speed Of Light


DANGEROUS “DISCOVERY” 
by Jonathan Gray

Have you heard of the "atomic clock"? The atomic clock measures time by the speed of radioactive decay. And this has given ages of billionsof years for the earth. But has this ever dawned on you? If light was once 10 billion times faster than now, then radioactive decay was faster to the same magnitude. A correction, once made, dates our earth as young! Latest research threatens not just dating, but other accepted theories, as well. Modern physics is now considering a theory that could throw into confusion virtually all of the accepted temporal paradigms of 21st-century science, including the age of the universe and the billions of years necessary for evolution. Further, it raises the distinct possibility that scientific validation exists for a (gasp) literal interpretation of the seminal passages of Genesis. Goodbye Scopes trial. The theory is deceptively simple: The speed of light is not constant, as we've been taught since the early 1930s, but has been steadily slowing since the first instance of time. If true, virtually all aspects of traditional physics are affected, including the presumed steady state of radioactive decay used to measure geological time. It’s an intriguing story – and like many revolutions in science, it begins with observations that just don’t fit currently accepted scientific dogma.

HOW THE DISCOVERY OCCURRED

Early in 1979, an Australian undergraduate student named Barry Setterfield, thought it would be interesting to chart all of the measurements of the speed of light since a Dutch astronomer named Olaf Roemer first measured light speed in the 17th century. Setterfield acquired data on over 163 measurements using 16 different methods over 300 years. The early measurements typically tracked the eclipses of the moons of Jupiter when the planet was near the Earth and compared it with observations when then planet was farther away. These observations were standard, simple and repeatable, and have been measured by astronomers since the invention of the telescope. These are demonstrated to astronomy students even today. The early astronomers kept meticulous notes and sketches, many of which are still available.

STARTLED BY THE DISCOVERY

Setterfield expected to see the recorded speeds grouped around the accepted value for light speed, roughly 299,792 kilometers /second. In simple terms, half of the historic measurements should have been higher and half should be lower. What he found defied belief: The derived light speeds from the early measurements were significantly faster than today. Even more intriguing, the older the observation, the faster the speed of light. A sampling of these values is listed below:
* In 1738: 303,320 +/- 310 km/second
* In 1861: 300,050 +/- 60 km/second
* In 1877: 299,921 +/- 13 km/second
* In 2004: 299,792 km/second (current accepted constant)

Setterfield teamed with statistician Dr. Trevor Norman and demonstrated that, even allowing for the clumsiness of early experiments, and correcting for the multiple lenses of early telescopes and other factors related to technology, the speed of light was discernibly higher 100 years ago, and as much as 7 percent higher in the 1700s. Dr. Norman confirmed that the measurements were statistically significant with a confidence of more than 99 percent. Setterfield and Norman published their results at SRI in July 1987 after extensive peer review. It would be easy to dismiss two relatively unknown researchers if theirs were the only voices in this wilderness and the historic data was the only anomaly. They are not. OTHERS AGREE: LIGHT HAS SLOWED Since the SRI publication in 1987, forefront researchers from Russia, Australia, Great Britain and the United States have published papers in prestigious journals questioning the constancy of the speed of light. During 2002 and 2003, Dr. Joao Magueijo, a physicist at Imperial College in London, Dr. John Barrow of Cambridge, Dr. Andy Albrecht of the University of California at Davis and Dr. John Moffat of the University of Toronto have all published work advocating their belief that light speed was much higher – as much as 10 to the 10th power faster – in the early stages of the "Big Bang" than it is today. (It's important to note that none of these researchers has expressed any bias toward a predetermined answer, biblical or otherwise. If anything, they are antagonistic toward a biblical world-view.) Dr. Magueijo believes that light speed was faster only in the instants following the beginning of time. Dr. Barrow, Barry Setterfield and others believe that light speed has been declining from the beginning of time to the historic near past.

THE REAL ISSUE

Dr. Magueijo has stated that the debate should not be whyand how the speed of light could vary, but what combination of irrefutable theories demands that it be constant at all. Setterfield now believes there are at least four other major observed anomalies consistent with a slowing speed of light: 1. quantized red-shift observations from other galaxies, 2. measured changes in atomic masses over time, 3. measured changes in Planck's Constant over time, 4. and differences between time as measured by the atomic clock, and time as measured by the orbits of the planets in our solar system. Perhaps the most interesting of these is the quantized red-shift data. The red shift refers to observations by astronomers of the light emitted by galaxies. Early astronomers noticed that galaxies considered to be most distant from the earth had light spectra shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. In 1929 astronomer Edwin Hubble compared the galaxies' spectra with their presumed distances (calculated using different methods), and showed that the amount of "red shift" was proportional to the calculated distance from Earth. Hubble and others postulated that the "red shift" was caused by the velocity of the galaxies as they receded from Earth and from each other – the farther away the galaxy, the faster the velocity, the more the observed Doppler red shift. Galaxies whose observed light is seen as shifted into the far red are considered to be moving at amazingly high speeds away from us. Hubble’s theory of the expanding universe demands an even distribution of red-shift data. Dr. William Tifft, now retired from the University of Arizona, measured and recorded red-shift data for over 20 years. Dr. Tifft found that the red-shift data were not random at all, but grouped into quantum bands. Quantum red-shift data simply does not fit in the comfortable world of classical physics. Where it does fit, like it was made for it, is in the Setterfield Hypothesis. According to Setterfield and others, declining light speeds would cause changes in the quantum states of atomic structure within these galaxies, leading to quantum shifts in the light emitted – precisely what Dr. Tifft and others detected. Setterfield believes that the speed of light was initially about 10 to the 10th power faster than it is today. After the creation of the universe, light speed declined following a curve approximating the curve of the cosecant squared. He believes that light speed reached a point where it is asymptotic since the mid 1960s. Though reasonably constant, he believes the speed still varies in waves – sometimes higher and sometimes lower than the accepted standard. Intriguingly, recent observations of the signals received from the aging satellites Galileo, Ulysses and Pioneer are also in the category of speed of light anomalies. An unexplained Doppler frequency shift has been detected from all of these satellites, even though the satellites' distances from the Earth are only about 20 times the distance from the Earth to the Sun – way too close for a traditional Doppler shift to occur in the electromagnetic spectrum. NASA scientists have attempted with little success to attribute the anomalies to an unknown acceleration. Setterfield suggests that equally plausible explanations are variations in c.

RESISTANCE FROM SCIENTIFIC “ELITE”

It’s important to recognize the resistance that the current hierarchy of science has to the possibility that light speed may not be constant. Dr. Joao Magueijo was forced to wait for over a year between submission of his initial work on varying light speed and publication. Setterfield, Dr. Tifft, Dr. Paul Davis, Dr. John Barrow and others have been subjected to peer review which borders on ridicule. Dr. Tifft's discussion of red-shift anomalies was published with seeming reluctance in the Astrophysical Journal in the mid 1980s with a rare editorial note pointing out that the referees "neither could find obvious errors with the analysis nor felt that they could enthusiastically endorse publication." After Dr. Tifft's initial publication, several astronomers devised extensive experiments in attempts to prove him wrong. Among them, two Scottish astronomers, Bruce Gutherie and William Napier from the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh, observed approximately 300 galaxies in the mid 1990s. They found to their surprise confirmation of quantum banding of red-shift data. They also had difficulty publishing their data. It has been reported that the prestigious Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics refused publication until an additional set of observations from 97 other spiral galaxies was included. A Fourier analysis of the 302 early data points, and the subsequent total of 399 data points strongly confirmed the quantum shifts. Despite this – and additional observations by Bell in 2003 – many scientists are still reluctant to give up on the theory that red shifts are solely caused by Doppler shifts. And have continued to claim that the red-shift quanta results by Tifft and others are due to sloppy research or insufficient data. It's intriguing to note that the first measurement of light speed by Olaf Roemer in the late 17th century was an attempt to disprove the Aristotelian belief that light speed was infinite. Despite overwhelming and repeatable evidence, over 50 years passed before the scientific hierarchy of the time accepted evidence which, in retrospect was clear, compelling and unimpeachable. The point is this. When something is proved to be true beyond reasonable doubt, do not expect the scientific world to automatically accept it. History shows they will continue to stubbornly resist. Did you know that even after modern explorers proved the earth to be round, a flat earth continued to be taught in the schools of Europe for the next 200 years! Why am I doing this now? Because of the tremendous benefit you will derive from the discovery of what our planet really was like in the days of our earliest ancestors. It is not what you may think. I just don't want you to miss out on such a shattering discovery.

May the Force be with us !!

With love and passion,
Amreish Siman

My Theory On The Decreasing Speed Of Light


A sudden intuition hit me as i came across an interesting article by Jonathan Gray on the recent findings by scientists around the world that the speed of light is found to be significantly decreasing over the years since it was first measured by Olaf Roamer in the 17th century( for full article,pls visit ( http://mindsparkenigma.blogspot.com/2010/06/startling-discovery-decreasing-speed-of.html).By having a keen interest in science,especially in the fields of astronomy and astrophysics,i read on enthusiatically startled by the findings.Also over the last recent years,i've began to explore spirituality and did plenty of soul-searching and it lead me to many sources of spiritual knowledge from various spiritual masters which transformed and moulded the way i look at life completely,for the better of course.And ever since till now,whenever i come across any piece of information of any findings,events,news and by active observation of people and my surroundings,i've developed an uncanny ability to view all data input from a spiritual point of view and slip into long hours of contemplation and analysis which resulted in astounding surge of universal knowledge which have gifted me great level of awareness and sensitivity to view the world we live in a distinctive manner.Simply put,i see the big picture,thanks to the Divine intervention.Now,what has my micro 'enlightenment' has got to do with the decreasing of the speed of light?I've mentioned that i've came across various forms of spiritual knowledge in the recent years,and one source in particular contained extensive and detailed explanation about the concept of spirituality,and assessed it thoroughly with a remarkable amount of R & D with an universal approach without sidelining any spiritual organization or master.According to them,our universe consists of 3 basic elements,these are subtle elements.The gross or physical elements that we can see,feel and touch are the five we all know - air,water,fire,land and sky,which make up the physical world,so we may think but the 'world' we came to know is just a tiny fraction of the universe.There are millions of subtle worlds right now,right here in front of us which we can't see except a fraction of the population who are gifted with the SIXTH SENSE,which i call divine intuition or extra sensory perception( for detailed info,visit http://www.spiritualresearchfoundation.org/articles/id/spiritualresearch/spiritualscience/sixthsense)These gifted elite group are able to see things most of us,including me can't.A large group of this select few belong to this foundation called SSRF( Spiritual Science Research Foundation) which is the source i'm talking about.The three subtle elements are :-

RAJA - Action and passion.(a person who consists majority of this element is Rajasik)
TAMA - Ignorance. ( a person who consists majority of this element is Tamasik)

According to Hinduism,the universe has three stages of existence,CREATION,SUSTENANCE and DESTRUCTION we are living in the era of KALIYUGA,the fourth and final era of the SUSTENANCE stage,in other words,we are living in a world which is on the brink of Doomsday.As per their research,the earlier eras of SATYAYUGA,TRETAYUGA and DWAPARYUGA consisted more of Sattva element,Satyayuga being the most and gradually decreasing as the eras passed where now in Kaliyuga,the predominant element is Raja and Tama,meaning the world we live in now is far less sattvik than it was once,and that simply translates to pollution and impurity,in the spiritual sense.

Now,my theory of what could possibly decrease the speed of light is this - Since the predominant subtle elements of today's world is Raja and Tama,which is are largely negative,and Sattva being the divine subtle element,my mindspark of the day said its because the steadily decreasing element of Sattva as years pass on,light which is a pure divine energy is proportionately slowed down as the universe is now densely made up of Raja and Tama,hence the results of the findings by scientists.

But western scientists do not take this into account because its not verifiable by modern physical science because there is simply no equipment to measure these subtle elements,it can only be felt by the elite group with advanced sixth sense.They will continue to debate and conduct experiments after experiments and tons of research only to reach a dead end unless they adapt an unorthodox,or shall i say re-evaluate their beliefs accepting Divine Intervention and Will as part of their research which is highly questionable.The only way to look at it,being a firm believer of the spiritual and metaphysical realities of the universe,is by adapting a more refined spiritual approach towards life,which i myself haven't even really begun in the REAL sense.
But i constantly live in gratitude and thank God every possible moment for every experience in every sense maintaining a positive outlook in life because i realised we are spiritual beings here on Earth for a temporary human experience,not human beings on Earth for a temporary spiritual experience ;)

May the blessings be !

With love and passion,
Amreish Siman